Raise Java language level to 17, update errorprone#10336
Open
niloc132 wants to merge 6 commits into
Open
Conversation
Member
Author
|
Depends on gwtproject/tools#39 |
Member
Author
|
Converted to draft while moving new APIs to triage and waiting for tools merge. |
Closed
niloc132
added
the
ready
Member
Author
|
CollectReferencesVisitorTest failure is due to asm version being 9.6 - the test only passes up to Java 22. This doesn't impact the compiler actually working, but is a failure specific to the test reading Object.clas. CompilationUnitTypeOracleUpdaterFromByteCodeTest has a similar problem, though it is designed to read bytecode from JDT's output, which is currently limited to a max of java 17. The test however still grabs Object.class, as above, which will be specific to whatever JRE is actually running the test. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
No description provided.